Menu
Tropentag 2019
Keynote speeches
Poster sessions
Oral presentations
Student reporters 2019
People
Plus
Tropentag 2018
Tropentag 2017
Tropentag 2016
Tropentag 2015
Tropentag 2014
Science Forum 2013
Tropentag 2013
Visit our other feeds!
Links
Tropentag Website
ATSAF e.V.
University of Bonn
Home
›
Forums
›
Resource use & services
›
Forests & agroforestry
Population density and human pressure on forest are not correlated says Mr. Joachim Schmerbeck from Teri University, India
Wed, 09/26/2012 - 09:21 — De-Registered User
The Forestry session of the Tropentag 2012 was moderated by
Mr. Johannes Dietz from the
World Agroforestry centre (ICRAF), Kenya. There were four presentations in the session of which
Mr. Joachim Schmerbeck was the first speaker. He presented the findings of his research on the topic
can development interventions reduce human pressure on forest? a case study from a long term observation in India. He explained that various researchers have tried over the years to determine the relationship between population and forest degradation in an area with some concluding that there is no relationship while others reported a positive relationship. The objective of his research was to determine this relationship by using long term observation. The study lasted for 21 years in the Kadavakurichi area in Tamil Nadu. In 1991, it was found that 1,707 people entered the forest on the seven days of survey, most of them for grazing, hunting, collection of fuel wood, manure and medicines. A total of 22,918 heads of livestock entered the forest of which almost 50% were from outside the study area. In 2012 the observation changed from what was found in 1991. 37% less people were found entering the forest. The main change was found among people collecting fuel wood and other products while there were almost no changes in number of people entering the forest for grazing. Mr. Schmerbeck concluded that, • The pressure on the forest in the study area has reduced in the past 20 years. • Population density and human pressure on forest are not correlated. • Many people are involved in the development programmes and benefitted. • People have other sources of income of which much can be allocated to development initiatives. • Goat rearing seems to be unaffected by these changes.
‹ Agroforestry and fruit diversity enhance food and nutrition security
Tropical agroforestry: learning from the past, projecting the future ›
Forests & agroforestry
population
De-Registered User's blog
Comments
Post new comment
Your name:
E-mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Homepage:
Subject:
Comment:
*
Input format
Full HTML
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
PlainText
More information about formatting options
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
What code is in the image?:
*
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Pictures
www.
flick
r
.com
Go to
tropentag's photostream
Tweets
Tweets by @tropentag
Recent blog posts
Anything birds eat, human can eats!
Policy briefs would simplify science: are policymakers and scientists ready?...
The Most Sustainable Tropentag Ever
Empowering the next generation of food security innovators
Certified coffee, good for the planet?
Hemp: grow it, not burn it!
Biological and economical battle of legumes and cereals..
Fearing Climate change? Farmers are the future…..
Can Scientist have fun? Case study: #Tropentag2019 Conference Dinner
“I’m sorry for your loss. May I check your pig?”
more
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
0 guests
online.
Navigation
Blogs
Recent posts
Comments
Post new comment